Head-to-head

Varjo XR-4 vs Samsung Galaxy XR

Varjo XR-4 scores 70/100 while Samsung Galaxy XR scores 89/100. Compare specs, price, pros, cons, and platform tradeoffs.

vs

Spec Table

Full Comparison

Spec Varjo XR-4 Samsung Galaxy XR
Score 70 /100 89 /100
Resolution 3840x3744 per eye4K micro-OLED class
Refresh Rate 90 Hz90 Hz class
Field of View 120 deg x 105 deg109 deg horizontal / 100 deg vertical
Tracking Inside-out or SteamVR tracking options with eye trackingEye, hand, voice, depth, and optional controllers
Battery Wired PC XR headsetUp to 2 hours general use; 2.5 hours video
Weight 1021 g class545 g
Platform Varjo Base / PC XRAndroid XR

Varjo XR-4 Verdict

Varjo XR-4 is a professional XR system, not a mainstream buyer pick. It belongs in the ranking because serious simulation and enterprise shoppers compare it, but most consumers should ignore it.

Exceptional resolution and pixel density
Professional mixed-reality passthrough
200 Hz eye tracking
Not a consumer gaming headset
Very expensive once configured

Samsung Galaxy XR Verdict

Samsung Galaxy XR is the most important new premium mixed-reality alternative to Vision Pro. It is expensive, but Android XR, Gemini, Google Play, and a lighter headset design give it a clearer everyday software story than most high-end XR devices.

First major Android XR headset
High-resolution micro-OLED display
Gemini and Google app integration
Much more expensive than Quest
Controller ecosystem is still young

As an Amazon Associate, TopVRNews earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, without changing our editorial verdicts. Details

Buy on Samsung $1,800