Head-to-head

Varjo XR-4 vs PICO 4 Ultra

Varjo XR-4 scores 70/100 while PICO 4 Ultra scores 78/100. Compare specs, price, pros, cons, and platform tradeoffs.

vs

Spec Table

Full Comparison

Spec Varjo XR-4 PICO 4 Ultra
Score 70 /100 78 /100
Resolution 3840x3744 per eye2160x2160 per eye
Refresh Rate 90 HzUp to 90 Hz
Field of View 120 deg x 105 deg104 deg class
Tracking Inside-out or SteamVR tracking options with eye trackingInside-out 6DoF with ring-free controllers
Battery Wired PC XR headsetRear battery; balanced design
Weight 1021 g class580 g
Platform Varjo Base / PC XRPICO OS

Varjo XR-4 Verdict

Varjo XR-4 is a professional XR system, not a mainstream buyer pick. It belongs in the ranking because serious simulation and enterprise shoppers compare it, but most consumers should ignore it.

Exceptional resolution and pixel density
Professional mixed-reality passthrough
200 Hz eye tracking
Not a consumer gaming headset
Very expensive once configured

PICO 4 Ultra Verdict

PICO 4 Ultra is a strong Quest-style mixed-reality alternative in markets where it is officially sold. For U.S. buyers, availability and software library depth keep Quest 3 and Quest 3S ahead.

Balanced front/rear headset design
XR2 Gen 2 platform with 12 GB RAM
Color mixed-reality passthrough and depth sensing
Limited U.S. retail presence
Store library is smaller than Quest

As an Amazon Associate, TopVRNews earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, without changing our editorial verdicts. Details

Buy on PICO $799